crime+scene

media type="custom" key="4714807"

My name is Detective katie. Two weeks ago I was called to a crime scene felex is the victom he had a party at his house and he invitied his friends over. The alleged victim was Kendra Goode ​. The suspect guilty of committing this crime is kendra. (How can Kendra be the victim and the suspect? The victim is the person the crime was committed against.) This suspect's guilt was confirmed through the testing and results of evidence collected at the crime scene.

The most incriminating piece of evidence was the note. The evidence was found area 8. The test performed was (Handwriting), kendra. The results of the test were kendras. This connects the suspect to the crime because (it had kendras hand wrighting on it . (What did the note say? Who signed it? How does this link her to the crime?)

The next piece of evidence collected was the hair brush. It was found area 6. The test performed was it had felexs Dna on the brush... The results of the test were it was kendras brush (If it had Felix's DNA, then how do you conclude it is Kendra's brush?). This connects the suspect to the crime because its kendras because it said goodie on it. (That is the brand name...not her name). How does this tie her to the crime?

Another piece of evidence collected was calone. It was found area 5 The test performed was it was genes DNA (It was a smells test) and on kendra goodes towl it had genes calone smell,.... The results of the test were (the smell of boys calone). This connects the suspect to the crime because it was kendras towl with dna of gene (How is this linked to the crime?)

The last piece of evidence collected was tape leaft. It was found area 10. The test performed was kendra has the dog hair,.... The results of the test were dog hair. This connects the suspect to the crime because kendra had the dogs fer on her clothes. (How does dog hair on her clothes connect her to Felix's murder?)

According to the evidence, the following is an account of the events believed to have gone down on that fateful day. i think kedra was the one she wante. (This is supposed to be a step-by-step explanation of how Kendra committed the crime.)

Therefore, kedra committed the crime of the hair brush the towl and the note) for (felix put kendra under his well so i think she killed him to get his money.

**Rubric for Podcasts** introduction. Provides relevant information and establishes a clear purpose engaging the listener immediately. || **__ Describes the topic and engages the audience as the introduction proceeds. __** || Somewhat engaging (covers well-known topic), and provides a vague purpose. || Irrelevant or inappropriate topic that minimally engages listener. Does not include an introduction or the purpose is vague and unclear. ||^  || 67% ||
 * ** CATEGORY ** || ** Exemplary **  || ** Proficient **  || ** Partially Proficient **  || ** Incomplete **  || ** POINTS **  ||
 * ** Introduction ** || ** 3 points ** || ** 2 points ** || ** 1 points ** || ** 0 points ** || ||
 * ^  || Catchy and clever
 * ^  || **__Tells who is speaking, date the podcast was produced, and where the speaker is located.__**  || Tells most of the following: who is speaking, date of the podcast, and location of speaker.  || Alludes to who is speaking, date of the podcast, and location of speaker.  || Speaker is not identified. No production date or location of the speaker is provided.  ||^   ||
 * ** Content ** || ** 6 points ** || ** 4 points ** || ** 2 points ** || ** 0 points ** || ||
 * ^  || The motive was detailed and clearly based on information delivered throughout the investigation.  || The motive is detailed and based on partial information delivered throughout the investigation.  || __**The motive is not very detailed and is sprinkled with inaccurate information.**__  || The motive is missing, or unclear or all information is inaccurate.  ||^   ||
 * ^  || Four pieces of strong evidence were presented and linked to the suspect in an organized, methodical manner.  || Three or four pieces of evidence were presented and/or linked to the suspect in a somewhat organized, thoughtful manner.  || **__ Two pieces of shaky evidence were presented and/or loosely linked to the suspect. Lack of organization.  __** || One to no pieces of unimportant evidence were presented in an unorganized manner.  ||^   ||
 * ^  || The events in the scenario are detailed, extremely organized and strongly supported with evidence and facts related to the crime scene.  || The events in the scenario are well organized, somewhat detailed, and supported with evidence from the crime scene. || The events in the crime scene lack organization, detail, and are weakly supported with evidence from the crime scene. || **__There was no clear direction and evidence was unimportant.__** ||^   ||
 * ^  || Conclusion clearly summarizes key information.  || Conclusion summarizes information.  || **__ Conclusion vaguely summarizes key information  __** || No conclusion is provided.  ||^   ||
 * ** Delivery ** || ** 3 points ** || ** 2 points ** || ** 1 point ** || ** 0 points ** || ||
 * ^  || Well rehearsed, smooth delivery in a conversational style.  || **__Rehearsed, smooth delivery.__**  || Appears unrehearsed with uneven delivery.  || Delivery is hesitant, and choppy and sounds like the presenter is reading.  ||^   ||
 * ^  || Highly effective enunciation and presenter's speech is clear and intelligible, not distant and muddled. Expression, and rhythm keep the audience listening. || **__Enunciation, expression, pacing are effective throughout the podcast.__**  || Enunciation, expression, rhythm are sometimes distracting during the podcast.  || Enunciation of spoken word is distant and muddled and not clear. Expression and rhythm are distracting throughout the podcast.  ||^   ||
 * ^  || Correct grammar is used throughout the podcast.  || **__Correct grammar is used during most of the podcast.__**  || Occasionally incorrect grammar is used during the podcast.  || Poor grammar is used throughout the podcast.  ||^   ||
 * ** Graphic and Music Enhancements ** || ** 3 points ** || ** 2 points ** || ** 1 points ** || ** 0 points ** || ||
 * ^  || **__Music enhances the mood, quality, and understanding of the presentation.__**  || Music provides supportive background to the podcast.  || Music provides somewhat distracting background to the podcast.  || Music is distracting to presentation.  ||^   ||
 * ^  || **__ All music enhancements are owned by the creator of the podcast or copyright cleared with appropriate documentation.  __** || Music enhancements are owned by the creator of the podcast or copyright cleared.  || Use of copyrighted works is questionable.  || Copyright infringement is obvious.  ||^   ||
 * ** Technical Production ** || ** 3 points ** || ** 2 points ** || ** 1 points ** || ** 0 points ** || ||
 * ^  || **__Presentation is recorded in a quiet environment without background noise and distractions.__**  || Presentation is recorded in a quiet environment with minimal background noise and distractions.  || Presentation is recorded in a semi-quiet environment with some background noise and distractions.  || Presentation is recorded in a noisy environment with constant background noise and distractions.  ||^   ||
 * ^  || **__Transitions are smooth and spaced correctly without noisy, dead space.__**  || Transitions are smooth with a minimal amount of ambient noise.  || Transitions are uneven with inconsistent spacing; ambient noise is present.  || Transitions are abrupt and background noise needs to be filtered.  ||^   ||
 * ^  || **__Volume of voice, music, and effects enhance the presentation.__**  || Volume is acceptable.  || Volume is occasionally inconsistent.  || Volume changes are highly distracting.  ||^   ||
 * ^  || **__Podcast length keeps the audience interested and engaged.__**  || Podcast length keeps audience listening.  || Podcast length is somewhat long or somewhat short to keep audience engaged.  || Podcast is either too long or too short to keep the audience engaged.  ||^   ||
 * ** TOTAL POINTS ** || 38/57